DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Kiouani, Amel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Azzag, N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tennah, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ghalmi, F. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-26T10:56:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-26T10:56:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2231-0916 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://depot.ensv.dz:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3112 | - |
dc.description | P. 1351-1357 | fr_FR |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Aim: Canine babesiosis is a vector-borne disease transmitted by ticks of the Ixodidae family. The effects of
infection in dogs can range from the subclinical to the severe lethal form. This study aimed to make an original contribution
to the knowledge of circulating species of Babesia spp. in dogs in the region of Algiers as well as mechanisms and risk
factors for their transmission.
Materials and Methods: An epidemiological study was carried out on 189 blood samples taken from dogs from April 2015
to January 2016. The samples taken underwent parasitological by Giemsa-stained blood smear and serological analyzes by
indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). The ticks were looked on all the dogs taken.
Results: Giemsa-stained blood smears revealed the presence of two groups of parasites of the genus Babesia: Large Babesia
(3/25, 12%) and small Babesia (22/25, 88%). The IFAT at a dilution of 1/32 showed an overall seroprevalence with Babesia
canis of 17.98% (95% confidence interval 11.53-22.46). The distribution of the antibody titers for the positive samples
showed that of the 34 positive sera with a titer ≥1/32, 28 sera remained positive at a dilution of 1/64 (14.81%), 22 at a dilution
of 1/128 (11.64%) and 15 sera remained positive at a dilution of 1/256 (7.93%). Although seroprevalence varied according
to canine population (20% and 19.49% in pet dogs and canine pound dogs, respectively, and 6.66-0% in farm dogs and
hunting dogs, respectively), statistical analysis showed no significant differences between populations. The antibody titers
obtained after several dilutions showed that 22 canine pound dog sera remained positive at a dilution of 1/128 compared
to pet dogs and farm dogs which ceased to be positive at the dilution of 1/64. The comparison between the two diagnostic
methods showed a strong agreement between the parasitological examination by blood smear and the serological method by
IFAT. However, IFAT was much more sensitive. The analysis of risk factors, which may influence B. canis seroprevalence,
has shown the influence of age, tick presence, and season. Finally, of the 242 ticks collected from a total of 59 dogs, only
one tick species was identified, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. | fr_FR |
dc.language.iso | en | fr_FR |
dc.publisher | Veterinary World | fr_FR |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol.13;No. 14 | - |
dc.subject | Algiers | fr_FR |
dc.subject | Babesia canis | fr_FR |
dc.subject | Babesia spp. | fr_FR |
dc.subject | blood smears | fr_FR |
dc.subject | dogs | fr_FR |
dc.subject | risk factors | fr_FR |
dc.subject | serology | fr_FR |
dc.subject | ticks | fr_FR |
dc.title | Infection with Babesia canis in dogs in the Algiers region: Parasitological and serological study | fr_FR |
dc.type | Article | fr_FR |
Appears in Collections: | Articles Scientifiques 2020
|